7/6/2023 0 Comments Crucial p5![]() As a result, these figures will reflect higher-sustained write speeds. This is different than full entropy tests which use 100% of the drive and take them into a steady state. Our testing process for these benchmarks fills the entire drive surface with data, then partitions a drive section equal to 5% of the drive capacity to simulate how the drive might respond to application workloads. This allows us to repeat the same workloads across a wide range of storage devices, including flash arrays and individual storage devices. These workloads offer a range of different testing profiles ranging from “four corners” tests, common database transfer size tests, to trace captures from different VDI environments.Īll of these tests leverage the common vdBench workload generator, with a scripting engine to automate and capture results over a large compute testing cluster. While not a perfect representation of actual workloads, synthetic tests do help to baseline storage devices with a repeatability factor that makes it easy to do apples-to-apples comparison between competing solutions. When it comes to benchmarking storage devices, application testing is best, and synthetic testing comes in second place. Looking at SQL Server average latency, the Crucial P5 Plus had an average latency of 103ms, which placed it at the very bottom of the leaderboard by a significant margin (right beside the Samsung 980).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |